On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:07 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Monday 02 November 2009, Michael Bruck wrote:
>> Hmm, even the correction is wrong again:
>>
>> Parameter 1 is not the target name an ARM11 device.
>> should be:
>> Parameter 1 is not the target name of an ARM11 device.
>
> I'd not object to seeing that fixed.  But I'll leave
> such a merge up to Øyvind, he's more on top of ARM11
> issue ... you didn't quite provide a patch.  :)
>
> At some point, feel free to start a separate thread
> for ETM issues (later hunks of that patch).

I think we should leave out these fixes to arm11 now.

The only issue that I'd like to get to the bottom of at this
point is the working area/arm926ejs/2646 regression...

Other than that I'm eager to open up for 0.4 dev commits
to master.


-- 
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to