You could consider fixing the error message in arm11.c that you can see in the first hunk of this diff:
http://repo.or.cz/w/openocd/digenius.git?a=commitdiff;h=15d8c480d204a56d60c1ce565c076473b7319d13 Michael On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 05:31, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > So: We tagged RC0 about four days ago, and there seems to be > agreement that getting it out soon is the way to go. > > And: all the committers have been pretty good (thanks!) about > not doing stuff that could destabilize things. Nothing big > enough to justify an RC1, so far... > > We're aiming to release by the END OF THIS WEEK! So: > > * If you know of anything that you think *MUST* get > addressed before then (worth holding up the release) > please follow up on this thread. Reference patches. > > CANDIDATES: [1] affecting writes to CFI flash, and > possibly related to some FT2232H issues too. > > * Likewise if there's something you really *WANT* to > see adddressed, follow it up here too. Reference > patches, including "I'm chasing this bug". (The > later the fix becomes available, the less likely > it is to merge before release...) > > CANDIDATES: -- none (so far) -- > > * Same for issues that need documentation, including > mention in release notes. > > CANDIDATE: libftdi 0.16 not working at full speed > for FTx232H devices, since thinks they always use > high speed (and 512 byte packets). > > In your followups, please be clear about issues which > are "must" vs. "want". > > - Dave > > [1] > https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-October/011825.html > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
