On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:58 AM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 October 2009, David Brownell wrote: >> This layers parts of XSVF directly over SVF, to handle XSTATE better, >> instead of expecting jtag_add_pathmove() to conform (it doesn't). > > I'm going to commit this even though I can't test it. > > Since we *know* jtag_add_statemove() [TYPO ABOVE!] is > wrong, using svf_add_statemove() has got to be at least > somewhat better. If it's not ... we'll have a handle > on a bug affecting both SVF and XSVF. > > I also tweaked the User's Guide to mention the two XSVF > utility scripts, and the five XSVF extension opcodes > that OpenOCD supports.
It sounds like you have been able to test this. I don't think we're going to see lots of testing until this is more stable and mature... OpenOCD has not been marketed as an FPGA/CPLD tool yet... -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
