On Tuesday 20 October 2009, David Brownell wrote: > This layers parts of XSVF directly over SVF, to handle XSTATE better, > instead of expecting jtag_add_pathmove() to conform (it doesn't).
I'm going to commit this even though I can't test it. Since we *know* jtag_add_statemove() [TYPO ABOVE!] is wrong, using svf_add_statemove() has got to be at least somewhat better. If it's not ... we'll have a handle on a bug affecting both SVF and XSVF. I also tweaked the User's Guide to mention the two XSVF utility scripts, and the five XSVF extension opcodes that OpenOCD supports. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
