On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > So, SWJ gets nowhere in OpenOCD until SWD is working. > > And we've seen no SWD patches at all. > > Actually we did, but it is a long time ago and they were > very disruptive.
Maybe this: https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2008-November/003742.html Advertised as a quick hack. Necessarily all the code which thinks it's talking JTAG would be horribly disappointed. :) > We get SWD/SWJ questions every so often, but I'm not very > excited... Advantage of SWD == fewer pins Disadvantage == slower, AFAICT (with dumb hw like ft2232) SWJ would be a lot more interesting if we had basic ETM instruction trace working, to build on. :) _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
