On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > Is there some problem the current scheme has? > > Yes.
Not according to what you say below ... > Lets say I have no idea what the default target script does, > but I know *precisely* what my board needs: srst_only > srst_pulls_trst. There's no problem, then. If that's what the board needs, just say so in its board.cfg file: reset_config srst_only srst_pulls_trst It's very rare that any chip config file needs to say anything about resetting ... since most of the time it's a function of board wiring. > What the heck should I write in the board config file to be *sure* > to override anything that the board config file defined? If you can't read the board config file you're modifying to see what it previously defined, you're in trouble. :) If the issue is how nTRST and nSRST should be driven, you can specify those too. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development