On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 23:39 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > I would intuitively expect to be able to write: > > > > reset_config none srst_only srst_pulls_trst > > > > The key bit is the 'none', which blows it back to a cleared state. > > What I'm arguing is that "none" should be default > and that any clever overriding & negotiation between board/target > scripts should happen in tcl. > > What are the chances that the current reset_config > board/target communication scheme is sufficient? > > Is it used today?
AFAIK, it was designed to allow a target file to specify chip-level behavior and a board file to specify board-level behavior. Without the current functionality, there is no way to create such layered support. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
