On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:37 PM, David Brownell<davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Sunday 28 June 2009, Ųyvind Harboe wrote: >> I've pondered whether OpenOCD berlios web site should distribute binaries >> or not and I figure that this is best left to package maintainers, just >> like in the good old days. > > Good. Next question: do you know of issues that need to be > fixed before 0.2.0 soure ships?
Duane was hot on the trail of some breakpoint fixes. Those were not regressions though. >> Michael Fischer has maintained a really neat website with lots of >> Windows binaries. Why should we dilute his efforts? > > Well, he needs a solution to make up for D2XX being not-good, > but other than that ... I agree that his stuff looked very nice. > It wasn't just OpenOCD. ISTR seeing Eclipse integration too. > I'd like to see that on Ubuntu! Michael Fischer was on his own release schedule before. I don't see a problem with him cherry picking some post 0.2 that solves some particular problems. I'd hate the idea of having 10 host platforms with a few outstanding problems on each and try to time a release until "all" problems have been solved. Better to let the package maintainers decide what's best for a particular platform. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://www.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
