On Sunday 28 June 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > I've pondered whether OpenOCD berlios web site should distribute binaries > or not and I figure that this is best left to package maintainers, just > like in the good old days.
Good. Next question: do you know of issues that need to be fixed before 0.2.0 soure ships? > Michael Fischer has maintained a really neat website with lots of > Windows binaries. Why should we dilute his efforts? Well, he needs a solution to make up for D2XX being not-good, but other than that ... I agree that his stuff looked very nice. It wasn't just OpenOCD. ISTR seeing Eclipse integration too. I'd like to see that on Ubuntu! > Vendors need to support their customers directly anyway. OpenOCD > is not about free support for vendors(I bet that one will come back > to bite me :-) Depends what you mean "bite". If you mean "makes vendors understand their role must include 'giving back to the community'" then I'd agree. > Similarly there needs to be one person who is responsible for each > type of Linux/Mac packaging schemes. That can be an "external" person, a distributor, so long as they feed back essential fixes. Having a list of such contacts might be useful, but not all projects do that. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
