> Today's OpenOCD handles both services (and more). > If you split out "Smart JTAG", would OpenOCD be > the split-out part ... or the target level service? > > I'd lean towards the latter.
My motivation for a low level JTAG over TCP/IP is that it would enable OpenOCD maintainers to run OpenOCD on their development PCs using remote access to a target. This used to be a significant problem for OpenOCD, but I'm not so sure it's that big a deal anymore. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
