On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Freddie Chopin<freddie_cho...@op.pl> wrote: > Xiaofan Chen pisze: >> Using MinGW/Msys may be complicated. But it is not that difficult to use >> Cygwin. Installaing Cygwin it can be an issue for average Windows users >> though. > > So it's complicated anyway [;
Yes Windows is complicated. ;-) Linux is actually more complicated. I consider myself power user of Windows and Linux. Other than not able to code (my biggest program ever written for work is two 2K word PIC16C72A and PIC16F872 program back in 2000-2002), I am very good at messing with the OS (using Windows since 1997 and Linux since 1998). Therefore I can build many complicated programs. But I do not expect many Windows users to be able to go through all the process. >> I believe you do not need the hacked libusb0.sys file. I think you just >> need to create the INF file for the whole device in stead of individual >> device. But I need to get an FT2232x based JTAG tools to prove that. >> Or Gene Smith can test that. > > I've checked that now, and normal libusb0.sys seems to work fine, but > you can never be sure, maybe after reset I will stop working or sth... Glad to hear that. Try to reset the computer and see if that works. ;-) Or take a rest and wait for tomorrow and see it that still works. ;-) >> 2) libftdi can be build under Cygwin pretty easily. Michael's SparkFun >> post mentioned that there would be errors. But with the latest >> libftdi 0.16 version, there are no errors any more. > > The most recent libftdi cannot be build under MSYS - the build fails, > but the library is created. Even though I like MinGW/Msys than Cygwin, it is a bit too limited. So I will take the more practical approach and use Cygwin when necessary. -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
