On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> --- src/target/trace.h (working copy)
> +++ src/target/trace.h (working copy)
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> typedef struct trace_point_s
> {
> uint32_t address;
> - u64 hit_counter;
> + uint64_t hit_counter;
> } trace_point_t;
>
> typedef struct trace_s
On x86_64 builds I now get:
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/helper -I../../src/jtag
-I../../src/xsvf -I/usr/local/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wformat-security -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wbad-function-cast
-Wcast-align -Wredundant-decls -Werror -MT trace.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/trace.Tpo
-c trace.c -o trace.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
trace.c: In function ‘handle_trace_point_command’:
trace.c:63: warning: format ‘%lld’ expects type ‘long long int’, but argument 4
has type ‘uint64_t’
make[3]: *** [trace.lo] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Making it "%llu" doesn't help. I guess this is one of the ways
that the previous "u64" behaved differently from "uint64_t"...
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
