Rick
On May 25, 2009, at 9:03 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 11:36 +0800, SimonQian wrote:As Zach Welch mentioned, my posts breaks the thread.Translation: for some reason he and a few others' replies are often (butnot always) threaded incorrectly in some e-mail readers. To give a basis for comparison, look at the BerliOS archive of his thread today, entitled 'svn tap name patch': https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-May/thread.html It appears as several scattered different threads, which is how it appeared in my mailbox (amidst all the other threads). Interestingly, more research shows that mail-archive.com handled it just fine: http://www.mail-archive.com/openocd-development@lists.berlios.de/ If I had to guess, they are smart enough to look for these kinds of exceptions based on subject. That's buggy in other respects.I don't know why, and even don't know how to break it.Me neither. I wrote you to see if we could figure it out off-list. My first guess might buggy/old client software; a new one might be related to different native languages (i18n bugs).I'll switch to GMail for OpenOCD maillist. Should it be working properly?Most likely. I cannot fathom what the problems might be. After havingdone the above research, I am willing to admit that there are bugs in Evolution's threading (at least compared to mail-archive.com), but the fact that mailman has the same problems says something bigger is happening here. Can anyone clue us in? Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
-- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development