Hello David, >I was running with the ft2232 and jtag patches ('92, '93), >and they didn't seem to resolve that issue. Which issue didn't seem to resolve?
In which case you have problems, with which targets? Regards, Michael -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: David Brownell [mailto:davi...@pacbell.net] Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Mai 2009 06:13 An: Zach Welch Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de; Michael Fischer Betreff: Re: [Openocd-development] Adding simulated target support for regression testing purposes On Saturday 23 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > . > > > One point could be the RESET signals SRST and TRST. Here the > > > FT2232 can set both signals at the same time, which I think > > > is used too. > > > > Yeah, I noticed that *sometimes* an ft2232 adapter was able > > to come up OK ... but other times it needed a "reset". > > > > I was wondering if the issue was maybe that the JTAG link > > wasn't getting properly reset ... either by TRST or some > > other process. > > > > This seems highly buglike to me. > > Has this problem been resolved in r18{90,92,93}? I was running with the ft2232 and jtag patches ('92, '93), and they didn't seem to resolve that issue. It was still not guaranteed that the server could start up properly without a reset in the recent past. It's not clear if they changed anything I was noticing (or not). Newish behavior: doing a reset later doesn't necessarily fix things. "scan_chain" stays the same. Need to abort the server, then restart it. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development