Hello Zach, it looks that the 1893 solve the problem here with the SAM7. Only a short test with the SAM7 and LPC2294. I have compare the jtag.c and ft2232.c against my 1888+patch version. Both files are equal. Therefore I suppose that the 1893 is working like the 1888+patch here. In the moment no time for a new big smoke test.
Regards, Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Zach Welch [mailto:z...@superlucidity.net] Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Mai 2009 01:53 An: David Brownell Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de; Michael Fischer Betreff: Re: [Openocd-development] Adding simulated target support for regression testing purposes On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 16:54 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 21 May 2009, Michael Fischer wrote: > > It looks that these JTAG interfaces have not the same behaviour. > > One point could be the RESET signals SRST and TRST. Here the > > FT2232 can set both signals at the same time, which I think > > is used too. > > Yeah, I noticed that *sometimes* an ft2232 adapter was able > to come up OK ... but other times it needed a "reset". > > I was wondering if the issue was maybe that the JTAG link > wasn't getting properly reset ... either by TRST or some > other process. > > This seems highly buglike to me. Has this problem been resolved in r18{90,92,93}? Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
