On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Magnus Lundin wrote: >> Not always, TAP_INVALID is really TAP_DONTCARE > > I was wondering about that. Someone should rename it > so it's no longer nonsense.
The point is to do away with "don't care", "default" and global variables. There will be a well defined state that the TAP controller moves to after a scan. The calling code defines this. If the calling code has a concept of "default", then the calling code implements storage to hold the "default" value. So *all* places where TAP_INVALID is passed in as an argument would be replaced by a specific state as defined by the calling code. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
