Zach Welch <z...@superlucidity.net> writes: > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 23:24 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote: >> Sorry to interrupt (; I thought that I'd share my "outsider's opinion" >> with all. > > Not at all. I hope more folks are willing to step up and share their > opinions; without feedback, the maintainers cannot know what you think. > Thank you for helping to demonstrate how that can be done.
[...] > > [...] >> comfortable situation, because I know how to compile the package, but - >> believe me - there are hundreds of "domestic ARM developers" who know >> nothing about MinGW, MSYS, autotools and stuff - configuring Eclipse to >> handle ARM gcc is pretty much a great achievement for them (I know, 'coz >> I've been there just a while ago). Actually there is NO good description >> of how to compile OpenOCD for Windows, so it's quite exclusive knowledge. > > If I have time, I will rectify this by providing some automated scripts > to provide a mingw32 build. Mostly, I am tired of breaking that build. Is it feasible to build the windows version on linux? I do this for simple utilities (flash updaters) using a linux version of mingw. There is also e.g. the nsis (Nullsoft) installer build system that could perhaps build the complete package. >> Any chance for a release branch - say - once every 2 months (0.1.0 was >> put up around the end of January)? > > A regular release schedule should be a priority for the community, and > the exact details should be determine soon by a consensus process. > > Stay tuned. [...] > >> And to make my mail a bit more positive - OpenOCD is moving (running?) >> in a good direction! It's very good that it's moving (running?) forward >> with great power. agreed. -- John Devereux _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
