On Tue, 12 May 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre <n...@cam.org> wrote: > > About performance: things are reasonable again. It takes 90 seconds to > > flash 450 KB to NAND instead of 5 minutes. But in the days of rev 1520 > > this was like 80 seconds, so there is still a slight regression left > > there. > > Any chance you can check if that residual performance regression > is somewhere between 1520 and 1606?
What I was saying is that, compared to 1520, the current head is like 10% slower. But it is way better than 1729 which was 4 times slower. Nicolas
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
