On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre <n...@cam.org> wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > >> I've committed a fix in 1753 for memory corruption introduced in 1730. >> >> Thanks for bisecting to the offending release. This is definitely a case >> of where numerous small commits saved my butt. >> >> Hopefully this covers the problem that you are seing, but I don't >> have your precise setup so I can't run the exact test case you >> are running... > > Fixed, thanks a lot.
Great! > About performance: things are reasonable again. It takes 90 seconds to > flash 450 KB to NAND instead of 5 minutes. But in the days of rev 1520 > this was like 80 seconds, so there is still a slight regression left > there. Any chance you can check if that residual performance regression is somewhere between 1520 and 1606? If there is a performance regression in the new stuff(inconceivable! :-) then it may well have other reasons than USB roundtrip time, the latest revision of the JTAG API handles this in the same way as before: post processing. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
