On Tuesday 12 May 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > I think we should be extremely careful about defining public interfaces.
"Defining" is less of an issue than "committing to"... :) > Especially since the JTAG API still (yes still! the hard bits are done > though) needs work & cleanup. Again I'll mention "liburjtag" ... it's perhaps worth considering whether there are things to cooperate on (JTAG structures and constants?), and where to focus on differentiation (testing apps vs debug/devel support?). I don't know that liburjag is much further along than libopenocd. But I see that it's in the works. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development