On May 12, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 10:32 -0700, David Brownell wrote: [snip]There seems to be no strong reason that OpenOCD should always need to be told "here's the only scan chain you should expect to use" ... when it could instead just look at the scan chain it finds, then autoconfigure, in common cases.You have convinced me that OpenOCD should add an autoconfigure mechanismbut continue to allow explicit manual configuration. I seem to recall this having been discussed in the past, but perhaps I am remembering some other feature under recent development. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
I had mentioned this a while back. I've been thinking through the approach and I'm slowly settling on a C++ implementation that would essentially be a rewrite. That said, I believe an autoconfig mechanism could be done on the current implementation, but it would probably be pretty difficult. I'll start drafting the formal proposal for my idea.
-- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
