Zach Welch wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 14:16 +0200, Michael Fischer wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> it looks that r1461 is working but r1462 not anymore, >> in case of the bus error. Who has commited the r1462? >> Upps, I had commited the changes from Zach here. >> >> @Zach >> please can you take a look at your patches again? >> >> - openocd-flash-static-keyword-v3.patch >> - openocd-lpc2000-fix-erase-obo.patch >> - openocd-jlink-fix-sign-ptr-warn.patch >> - openocd-wextra-etm.patch >> - openocd-wextra-jtag.patch >> - openocd-add-new-tap-symbols-v6.patch >> > > I sent those patches separately, so I am _not_ happy to be asked this. > > I am going out for the day, so you should take a look for yourself. > > Z > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > There was an old problem in int at91sam7_old_flash_bank_command(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx, char *cmd, char **args, int argc, struct flash_bank_s *bank)
at91sam7_old_info->num_planes should be initialised to default value 1. This error was exposed by the changed link address that resulted from converting a lot of things to static. Since at91sam7_old has been retired it is not relevant for bleeding edge development, but thosse who work with older and less experimental revisions it is good to know. Thanks Michael for the testing. efence can be very useful tool ! Regards Magnus _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
