>> I expect the functionality to be re-implemented in a way that the >> community will support, even if that means adding back nearly identical >> code. If I were in Øyvind's shoes, I would rather see the in_handler >> functionality re-implemented cleanly than just put it back as it was. >> > True, > but nobody has argued against reimplementing cleanly, but that is > not retiring functionality and changing the API.
My current plan is to investigate a generic callback mechanism that is not incestuous with any of the other jtag_add_xxx commands. I'll do that Monday, until then I'll spend the time I have on regressions and bugs. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
