Øyvind Harboe wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Laurent Gauch > <laurent.ga...@amontec.com> wrote: > >> Yes it could. But giving this out_mask info to the low layer JTAG API can >> really help to accelerate the JTAG interface itself and accelerating the >> OpenOCD by the way. >> > > This is an extraordinary claim that I do not accept at face value. > extraordinary ? When we created the OpenOCD JTAG API (Dominic and I at Amontec in 2005 before any SVN server, any forum ...), we was thinking to provide an extensible JTAG layer to OpenOCD allowing to accelerate the JTAG Layer Interface! The _mask could be a very important information to have in the Low Layer JTAG interface.
Adding NULL in the calling is so complicated for you ? > I also don't see why it is necessary to complicate the API/helper > functions to achieve this and why it could uniquely be achieved > this way. > > You do not see because you are not one of the first author of the OPENOCD. Your patch on JTAG API is a really regression ! :-( > > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
