On May 3, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Michael Bruck wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Rick Altherr <kc8...@kc8apf.net> wrote:In the next few weeks I would like to prepare a roadmap document for where I think a project like this one should go. I will make that available to this group. That will basically be done to determine who and how many other folks would see my vision as an attractive destination. From that reaction I will then decide whether to make my fork public or not. But the idea that any such development could be done by pouring it through some tiny dinnerglasses is silly, and economic suicide.So you appear to be settled on forking. Good luck. I wish you well.Please do not use this list to discuss anything related to your fork.I want to read Dick's proposal here on this list. I am a bit surprised that people around here would be so close-minded that they don't even want to hear other people's ideas. Michael
I believe you misunderstood. I'm open to hearing Dick's proposal if it is actually a proposal on how to move forward with OpenOCD. Per his statement, that isn't what he was offering. He was drafting the proposal to gauge whether or not his fork should be public or not. There was no statement that he was interested in continuing work on OpenOCD.
What I am against is having the openocd list being used for organizing Dick's fork. If he wants to fork, then great. He can setup a website, mailing list, source repo, etc.
-- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
