Michael Bruck wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Rick Altherr <kc8...@kc8apf.net> wrote:
>
>>> In the next few weeks I would like to prepare a roadmap document for where
>>> I think a project like this one should go. I will make that available to
>>> this group. That will basically be done to determine who and how many other
>>> folks would see my vision as an attractive destination. From that reaction
>>> I will then decide whether to make my fork public or not. But the idea that
>>> any such development could be done by pouring it through some tiny dinner
>>> glasses is silly, and economic suicide.
>>>
>>>
>> So you appear to be settled on forking. Good luck. I wish you well.
>> Please do not use this list to discuss anything related to your fork.
>>
>
> I want to read Dick's proposal here on this list.
>
>
Might be interesting ...
> I am a bit surprised that people around here would be so close-minded
> that they don't even want to hear other people's ideas.
>
>
... but after beeing told in so many words and colorful analogies that
The present OpenOCD is garbage
Only after Dick has sacrificed his valuable time is it worth using,
implying he is true carrier of skill
If we dont immediatley accept his ideas then we are stupid or at
least ignorant fools
at least I am less than thrilled and I can agree with Rick to wish him
luck somewhere else.
Magnus
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
