Øyvind Harboe wrote: > Ironically, resisting the CMake patch, might the best > way to get people to stand up and report their interst ;-) > > I'm starting to be more convinced that having both > committed to svn is not detrimental to OpenOCD, > the crowd is growing and you're getting some good > names on board. > > Magnus worded my attitude towards build systems well, > except that I'm less curious than he is w.r.t. build systems. > I use them until they break, tinker with them desperately > not trying to learn something, before finally giving in and > trying to figure out a better way to do things.... > > I'm sure, a year from now, I'll be using CMake(for my > own projects) if it is as good as everybody cliams. >
Thanks for some movement on your position. My aim in promoting CMake is to simplify things for people, including me. I believe CMake brings simplification to a complex set of goals. It only takes a few minutes to get a whif of that simplification. So that is why I am asking that folks try the patch when they get a chance. Dick _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
