Displaying a warning and simply going on with whatever default when
a bad/mistyped option is provided does not sound very friendly to me.
Let's fail the command instead, and have the help text for the command
give a better hint.
---
src/flash/nand.c | 6 ++++--
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/flash/nand.c b/src/flash/nand.c
index c42291b..8708ef3 100644
--- a/src/flash/nand.c
+++ b/src/flash/nand.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ int nand_init(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx)
register_command(cmd_ctx, nand_cmd, "dump",
handle_nand_dump_command, COMMAND_EXEC,
"dump from NAND flash device
<num> <filename> <offset> <size> [options]");
register_command(cmd_ctx, nand_cmd, "write",
handle_nand_write_command, COMMAND_EXEC,
- "write to NAND flash device
<num> <filename> <offset> [options]");
+ "write to NAND flash device
<num> <filename> <offset> [oob_raw|oob_only]");
register_command(cmd_ctx, nand_cmd, "raw_access",
handle_nand_raw_access_command, COMMAND_EXEC,
"raw access to NAND flash
device <num> ['enable'|'disable']");
}
@@ -1254,7 +1254,6 @@ int handle_nand_write_command(struct command_context_s
*cmd_ctx, char *cmd, char
u8 *oob = NULL;
u32 oob_size = 0;
- duration_start_measure(&duration);
offset = strtoul(args[2], NULL, 0);
if (argc > 3)
@@ -1269,10 +1268,13 @@ int handle_nand_write_command(struct command_context_s
*cmd_ctx, char *cmd, char
else
{
command_print(cmd_ctx, "unknown option:
%s", args[i]);
+ return ERROR_COMMAND_SYNTAX_ERROR;
}
}
}
+ duration_start_measure(&duration);
+
if (fileio_open(&fileio, args[1], FILEIO_READ, FILEIO_BINARY)
!= ERROR_OK)
{
return ERROR_OK;
--
1.6.2-rc2.GIT
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
