*the thread mentioned a virtual appliance* => for VMWare ... VM and VMWare
are two separated things, at least for me. A VM can be also XEN or whatever
you use for virtualization, it does not need to be VMWare ...
anyway... If you are a Sys-Admin yourself you might consider setting it up
on your own or hire somebody that does it, if you want to establish a
reliable service you need somebody who spends 1-2 hours per month to take
care of needed sys-upgrades et cetera.

Deploying OpenMeetings on 64Bit Debian or 64Bit Ubuntu on a XEN Server for
example is what we have done several times. It is a bit more complex as a
simple dedicated Server as the 3th party tools often need to be compiled
manually for each Virtual Instance as there are no ready / up-to-date
packages in the official repositories, but it is of course possible.

Sebastian


2011/6/20 Mike <[email protected]>

> I too run a vm based fax server and haven't had any problems but then it's
> very low use too.
>
> Anything special to take into considering when buildin OM onto a virtual
> machine?
> I ask because the thread mentioned a virtual appliance being available but
> I'm not clear on the benefits over just building it myself.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:35 AM, shawn wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Asterisk used to have these issues with reviving faxes. I've heard this is
>> resolved in recent versions.
>>
>> That said, I haven't really noticed any issues with voice in voip vm
>> systems. There might be sync issues if you record a meeting on a vm - don't
>> know.
>>
>> I pay for a vps from a company that runs kvm though I haven't gotten into
>> most of the features.
>> On Jun 20, 2011 10:14 AM, "Mike" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I don't rent, I own the infrastructure so can dedicate hardware. Most of
>> my
>> > blades are minimum dual duo-core 2.4 and up with 8 to 16GB of memory.
>> Based
>> > on what you mention below, sounds like I have plenty of power.
>> >
>> > The problem is that even in testing sip servers for example, we've come
>> > across plenty of timing issues where the clock would skew and become a
>> > problem so have since avoided anything which is real time such as sip or
>> > audio/video.
>> >
>> > This is why I thought it was interesting when I saw this thread as I
>> most
>> > definitely like to use VM's when possible because of the benefits in
>> > maintenance.
>> >
>> > Sounds like you don't have any concerns using OM on VM's so I think I'll
>> > give it a try. I tend not to overburden blades when doing this because
>> > hardware is cheap, complaints aren't.
>> >
>> > Thanks for the input.
>> >
>> > Mike
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:53 AM, [email protected] <
>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Mike,
>> >>
>> >> performance hardly depends on VM VS dedicated server. It is just often
>> the
>> >> case that people rent a cheap VM for 20 Euros /Bugs and then find out
>> that
>> >> they have no SWAP space, not enough memory et cetera and no chance in
>> >> changing that with their cheap VM package as they have no control about
>> the
>> >> Server that hosts all the VMs and manages the HW resources.
>> >>
>> >> If you have a scenario where you actually have the full control about
>> the
>> >> VMs, virtualization has the same pro's and cons like with any other
>> >> application and you can calc the IO or number of simultaneous users
>> same
>> >> like on a dedicated server.
>> >>
>> >> Absolute numbers depend on the use-case.
>> >> Around 500-1000 simultaneous users for 4GB RAM, 3 GHz CPU.
>> >>
>> >> Sebastian
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2011/6/20 Mike <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >>> Can this actually be done on a vm? I've been using a dedicated server
>> >>> because people used to say it wasn't worth doing on vm because of the
>> >>> realtime requirements. Assuming beefy enough hardware and resources to
>> the
>> >>> vm, what could one expect in terms of simultaneous users? Anyone have
>> any
>> >>> input based on their own usage.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Sebastian Wagner <
>> [email protected]>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Thanks Diogo,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have slightly modified the wiki/installation with the links:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/InstallationOpenMeetings#VMWare
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Sebastian
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >>>> "OpenMeetings User" group.
>> >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/openmeetings-user/-/iLyO0_5x604J.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>>> [email protected].
>> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >>> "OpenMeetings User" group.
>> >>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> [email protected].
>> >>> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Sebastian Wagner
>> >> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> >> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
>> >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> >> [email protected]
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >> "OpenMeetings User" group.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected].
>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en.
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "OpenMeetings User" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> .
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OpenMeetings User" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OpenMeetings User" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en.
>



-- 
Sebastian Wagner
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
[email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenMeetings User" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en.

Reply via email to