On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:52:18 GMT, Andy Goryachev <ango...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Although... there is only one use now of the default constructor, so it >> would be trivial to change it and dispense with the first constructor. > > it's a minor thing; we could do it later if you plan a follow-up - I more > dislike the idea of having an unused array... I'll file a few cleanup bugs before I integrate and note them in comments. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1814#discussion_r2140840593
