On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:38:39 GMT, Michael Strauß <mstra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> good idea, even though it does not affect generated javadoc. >> will do next time, to avoid re-setting the approvals ;-) > >> will do next time, to avoid re-setting the approvals ;-) > > I'll re-approve if you decide to do the changes anyway. it is not required, and the code is inconsistent (Stage:472) ... but ok. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1717#discussion_r1985289103