On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 22:31:14 GMT, Andy Goryachev <ango...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Kevin Rushforth has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional 
>> commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Add pointer to CSR in JBS
>>  - Remove extra blank lines
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into 8309381-incubator.dev
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into 8309381-incubator.dev
>>  - Remove call to doPrivileged
>>  - 8309381: Support JavaFX incubator modules
>
> build.gradle line 2877:
> 
>> 2875: // Add a project declaration for each incubator module here, leaving 
>> the
>> 2876: // incubator placeholder lines as an example.
>> 2877: // BEGIN: incubator placeholder
> 
> Q: maybe we should mention the JBS every time we say the word "incubator"?
> 
> It might be useful to anyone who is looking at the code and has no access to 
> git history (or when git history is obscured by a move).  I mean, JBS is our 
> knowledge base, and it usually helps.

I generally prefer not to do this. In this case, the JBS Enhancement isn't what 
we would want to point to anyway (it would just be a placeholder). I can see 
some value in pointing to the CSR, so I'll add that here (I don't think there a 
need to repeat it).

What would really be useful, though, is a pointer to a template with a sample 
module, along the lines of what I mentioned in #1617, and a pointer to the JEP 
(which gets back to an earlier discussion of a permanent repository for JEPs). 
I'll file a follow-up issue to address this.

> settings.gradle line 42:
> 
>> 40:         "web",
>> 41:         "media",
>> 42:         "systemTests"
> 
> thank you for placing each entry on a separate line!
> 
> I would prefer to remove the blank lines around the comment so as not to 
> break the visual grouping (the comments are typically syntax colored anyway 
> unless the user is on TRS80)

OK

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1616#discussion_r1866245340
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1616#discussion_r1866249974

Reply via email to