Thanks for the feedback! I'm hopeful that texture wrapping/filtering can be added at some point too, I've definitely had times where it'd be helpful, though I do appreciate REPEAT textures being the default behavior at least (even if that's not actually a documented feature...)
A small (but non-trivial) amount of work will go a long way into improving JavaFX 3D quite a bit, and I hope that I can contribute at least a bit towards that. On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 12:45 AM Risto Vaher <ristovaher1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been using JavaFX's 3D api for a while now and i think this is an > important addition and it would benefit me quite a lot, but honestly i have > come to accept that improving the 3D api is not a priority for JavaFX, > neither important at all (probably because there are not that many people > actually using it, which is a shame because i think it could be quite great) > Very obvious features are still missing from it after many years, vertex > colors being one of them but also texture filtering and wrapping mode which > would be trivial to implement since every graphics API supports it and it > is quite an important feature imo. > > As for your specific proposal, im all for it and i think it should be > implemented because every engine/graphics API that is at least half decent > supports vertex colors and i believe it is an important feature. > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 7:53 AM Knee Snap <kneeste...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> This is a continuation of a previous email thread: "[Feature Proposal] >> Vertex Colors on TriangleMesh". >> I'm creating a new email thread because after discussion I've put >> together a feature proposal, and it serves largely as a summary of the >> previous email thread. (Better organized as a feature proposal) >> >> *Feature Proposal:* >> https://github.com/Kneesnap/misc-public/blob/main/documents/javafx/feature-proposals/vertex-colors/proposal.md >> I had previously discussed a draft PR, but considering how simple the >> proposed public API additions are to discuss, I don't think it's actually >> that helpful. >> >> *What's next?* >> I'm currently happy with the design and seeing as it's been discussed >> already, I could probably ask Kevin for a review. But, I'd like to give >> another opportunity for design discussion before doing so, just in-case >> there are any further considerations brought up. >> So, I open up the floor again. Does anyone have any thoughts on this >> proposal? Concerns? Questions? Suggestions? Constructive criticism? I >> eagerly await the feedback. >> >> After API discussion concludes, I plan to pass it off to Kevin for >> review/approval, and if it is approved, the subsequent CSR creation. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> >>
