As a reminder, contributors must not include 3rd-party code in any openjdk repo. Per the terms of the OCA, all code that you contribute to OpenJDK must be your own code. This includes code you push to openjdk/jfx-sandbox and code in a branch of a personal fork of openjdk/jfx from which you create a PR.

-- Kevin


On 4/28/2024 2:45 PM, Thiago Milczarek Sayão wrote:
Hi,

I managed to display a very basic wayland toplevel surface from java:
https://github.com/tsayao/glass-wayland

If you are using intellij, just run the "Test App" (with java 22).

generate.sh will jextract the code from wayland-client.

I rushed to get the window displayed - so it doesn't look good yet (but I do accept suggestions).

It uses a java wayland-scanner (included) to read protocol xml files and generate code that uses jextracted calls.

The sample also binds EGL and GL apis, but just because wayland requires a buffer to display the surface. Maybe it was easier to use a shared memory :)

Credits to (I adapted it to ouput jextract compatible code):
https://github.com/gfxstrand/wayland-java/tree/master/scanner

Cheers

Em ter., 23 de abr. de 2024 às 09:11, Thiago Milczarek Sayão <thiago.sa...@gmail.com> escreveu:

    I'm doing some work here:
    https://github.com/tsayao/glass-wayland

    So far it's been a good experience to use FFM / jextract.

    The idea is to plug it as a glass wayland backend when it's good
    enough.



    Em seg., 22 de abr. de 2024 às 16:16, Nir Lisker
    <nlis...@gmail.com> escreveu:

        Not sure it helps with warmup, but marking a foreign function
        as critical can improve performance:
        
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/22/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/foreign/Linker.Option.html#critical(boolean).

        On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:02 PM Philip Race
        <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote:

            No, it wasn't. I didn't even use jextracted code.
            The startup cost is around initialisation of FFM - around
            70 ms (IIRC) overhead on my MacBook
            Then creation of VarHandles and MethodHandles - 2-5 ms
            each is what I measured, so do these lazily if you can.
            And warmup cost is that it takes about 10000 iterations to
            get code fully compiled.

            java -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version 2>&1 | grep
            CompileThreshold
                 intx CompileThreshold                         =
            10000                                  {pd product} {default}
                double CompileThresholdScaling = 1.000000 {product}
            {default}
                uintx IncreaseFirstTierCompileThresholdAt      =
            50                                        {product} {default}
                 intx Tier2CompileThreshold                    =
            0                                         {product} {default}
                 intx Tier3CompileThreshold                    =
            2000                                      {product} {default}
                 intx Tier4CompileThreshold                    =
            15000                                     {product} {default}

            -phil.


            On 4/22/24 11:45 AM, Thiago Milczarek Sayão wrote:
            I think the startup time might be related to all static
            symbol lookups.
            So I'm manually including just what is needed:
            jextract --output src -t com.sun.glass.wayland.extracted \
               --header-class-name GlassWayland \
               `pkg-config --libs glib-2.0 gio-2.0 libportal wayland-client`  \
               `pkg-config --cflags-only-I glib-2.0 gio-2.0 libportal 
wayland-client`  \
                glass-wayland.h \
                --include-function xdp_portal_initable_new \
                --include-function xdp_session_close \
                --include-function xdp_portal_open_file \
                --include-function xdp_portal_open_file_finish \
                --include-function g_object_unref \
                --include-function g_timeout_add \
                --include-function g_add_idle \
                --include-function g_main_loop_run \
                --include-function g_main_loop_new \
                --include-function g_main_loop_ref \
                --include-function g_main_loop_unref \
                --include-function g_main_loop_quit \
                --include-function g_settings_new \
                --include-function g_settings_get_int \
                --include-function wl_display_connect \
                --include-function wl_display_disconnect \
                --include-function wl_display_roundtrip \
                --include-function wl_display_dispatch_pending \
                --include-typedef GAsyncReadyCallback \
                --include-typedef GSourceFunc \
                --include-typedef GError

            Em seg., 22 de abr. de 2024 às 13:24, Philip Race
            <philip.r...@oracle.com> escreveu:

                As a reminder, using FFM will require all FX
                *applications* to specify --enable-native-access on
                the command line
                Although this is likely coming to JNI soon too.

                
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/core/restricted-methods.html

                But one thing to watch out for with FFM is startup +
                warm up time.
                I struggled a lot with that in using FFM for just one
                library in the java.desktop module.

                -phil

                On 4/22/24 9:12 AM, Nir Lisker wrote:
                Sorry, we bumped to Java 21 in JavaFX 22 I think
                since we preserve the N-1 rule.

                On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 6:03 PM Nir Lisker
                <nlis...@gmail.com> wrote:

                    I think that we'll be able to bump to Java 25 in
                    JavaFX 25, like we did with 21. I suggested
                    initially to bump to Java 22 exactly for FFM as
                    it's very useful for JavaFX, but was told we
                    shouldn't since it's not an LTS version.

                    I have no idea how long the work on Wayland will
                    take including the code review (a rather long
                    process), but you should be able to request code
                    reviews with FFM and have it ready for
                    integration by Java 25.

                    On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:49 PM Thiago Milczarek
                    Sayão <thiago.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

                        I was just experimenting, but it seems to be
                        less work than going with JNI.
                        If I am correct, the next Java LTS will be
                        25, which will be required on JavaFX 29 to
                        be released on September/29.

                        It's 7 years - that's really too much.

                        Maybe it's still worthwhile to prototype
                        using FFM and then port everything to JNI.

                        -- Thiago.


                        Em seg., 22 de abr. de 2024 às 11:21, Kevin
                        Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> escreveu:

                            Note also that we cannot use Panama in
                            the JavaFX internals yet, since
                            the minimum version of the JDK is 21.

                            -- Kevin


                            On 4/21/2024 10:51 AM, Thiago Milczarek
                            Sayão wrote:
                            > Hi,
                            >
                            > I did a small test app to explore
                            Wayland client and portals (for
                            > Robot and dialogs such as file open/save).
                            >
                            >
                            
https://github.com/tsayao/wayland-test/blob/main/wayland-test.c
                            >
                            > It seems it will work as a glass
                            backend, but some walls will be hit
                            > on the way :)
                            >
                            > I have tried to use jextract (from
                            project Panama) to work directly
                            > with java, but it seems it does not
                            support wl_ types.
                            >
                            > -- Thiago.



Reply via email to