On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 23:30:39 GMT, Michael Strauß <mstra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/application/Platform.java line >> 466: >> >>> 464: * so applications should not assume that a particular preference >>> is always available. >>> 465: * <p> >>> 466: * The following list contains all preferences that are >>> potentially available on the specified platforms: >> >> Is it possible that a preference might be stored that isn't in the below >> list? Or is it guaranteed that the _only_ possible preferences that will >> ever be stored are those documented here? If the former, I recommend >> removing the word "all". If the latter, then it is OK as is, if we are >> comfortable specifying this. > > I think we should indeed document _all_ possible preferences for the platform > toolkit implementations we control. Of course, this means that we need to > keep this list in sync with the actual implementation. +1 we could put the doc (in markdown format) in the doc-files/platform directory (or create any other subdirectory, see JDK-8309749) ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1014#discussion_r1316518504
