On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:30:12 GMT, Jose Pereda <jper...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR removes an unnecessary check that was added as part of 
>> [JDK-8267551](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8267551).
>> 
>> As commented in the [issue](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8300872), 
>> there were no failing/passing tests before/after these lines were added, and 
>> there are no actual tests that get into the case.
>> 
>> The mentioned check caused, as a side effect, the JDK-8300872 issue, as 
>> running under a (deprecated) security manager fails with:
>> 
>> java.security.AccessControlException: access denied 
>> ("java.io.FilePermission" 
>> "jrt:/javafx.controls/com/sun/javafx/scene/control/skin/modena/pattern-transparent.png"
>>  "read")
>> ...
>> at javafx.graphics/javafx.scene.image.Image.validateUrl(Image.java:1127)
>> ...
>> 
>> when `File::exists` is evaluated over an image bundled in a jar.
>
> Jose Pereda has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add system test

Looks good. I left two minor suggestions for changes to the comments in the new 
policy file.

tests/system/src/test/resources/test/sandbox/empty.policy line 2:

> 1: // Policy file for sandbox tests
> 2: // Use as follows: -Djava.security.policy=test.policy

Minor: should be `empty.policy`

tests/system/src/test/resources/test/sandbox/empty.policy line 4:

> 2: // Use as follows: -Djava.security.policy=test.policy
> 3: 
> 4: // No permissions to read resource files are granted

Minor: maybe also say that all FX permissions are granted?

-------------

Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1042

Reply via email to