On 2013-06-21 5:53 PM, James Relph wrote: > I initially dropped the 64-bit versions in and it freaked out big > style (couldn't login initially). The netatalk bit seems to be > running fine with those as well. Does samba even use PAM for talking > with winbind or deal directly?
You need to have both, hence the $ISA, since 32 and 64 bits apps will each need the proper binary. And I realized I gave you a wrong path earlier for the ldd, forgotten I had just introduced both 32/64 Samba binaries, I should have noticed it was way too short: /opt/csw/sbin/amd64 or /opt/csw/sbin/sparcv9 is where they are. And it does link against libpam: find object=libpam.so.1; required by /opt/csw/sbin/amd64/smbd > It doesn't look like it's asking the AD oddly (yet the PAM modules > do), I need to run Wireshark on there and see what's actually > happening. Also raising the Samba debug level and trying to find some nuggets of information there. Laurent _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
