can you give us a look at "testparm -v" so we can see the configuration setup?
obviously hide IPs and domains if you need to. On 21 June 2013 13:50, James Relph <ja...@themacplace.co.uk> wrote: > Thanks Laurent, appreciate the help. > > > I'm maintaining that package, I do want to keep it running on OI as > well, so it's good to know it's working there. > > Both cswsamba and cswwinbind do seem to be working fine, they're just not > talking to each other! > > > It might be a Samba configuration issue, but before trying on a > Samba-specific list, we can surely dig here first :-) > > Can you post the output of: > > > > ldd -v /opt/csw/sbin/smbd /opt/csw/sbin/nmbd /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > > /opt/csw/sbin/smbd: > > find object=libc.so.1; required by /opt/csw/sbin/smbd > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > find version=libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.18) => /lib/libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1 > > object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for /usr/lib/ld.so.1 > > object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for libm.so.2 > > find object=libm.so.2; required by /lib/libc.so.1 > libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 > > find object=libc.so.1; required by /lib/libm.so.2 > find version=libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1 > /opt/csw/sbin/nmbd: > > find object=libc.so.1; required by /opt/csw/sbin/nmbd > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > find version=libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.18) => /lib/libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1 > > object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for /usr/lib/ld.so.1 > > object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for libm.so.2 > > find object=libm.so.2; required by /lib/libc.so.1 > libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 > > find object=libc.so.1; required by /lib/libm.so.2 > find version=libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1 > /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd: > > find object=libc.so.1; required by /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 > find version=libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.18) => /lib/libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1 > > object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for /usr/lib/ld.so.1 > > object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for libm.so.2 > > find object=libm.so.2; required by /lib/libc.so.1 > libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 > > find object=libc.so.1; required by /lib/libm.so.2 > find version=libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1 > libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1 > > > ps -edf | egrep 'smbd|nmbd|winbind' > > root 19244 19243 0 06:37:01 ? 1:15 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19260 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:02 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19255 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 21427 19243 0 09:06:04 ? 1:02 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19257 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19239 17386 0 06:36:59 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/smbd -D > root 19258 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:02 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19243 17386 0 06:37:01 ? 0:21 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19240 19239 0 06:36:59 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/smbd -D > root 19251 19243 0 06:37:51 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19254 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 26205 26165 0 13:48:20 pts/1 0:00 egrep smbd|nmbd|winbind > root 19256 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:07 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19261 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19238 17386 0 06:36:59 ? 0:06 /opt/csw/sbin/nmbd -D > root 19252 19243 0 06:37:51 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19262 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 19259 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd > -D > root 26201 19239 0 13:48:07 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/smbd -D > > > > Also, do you have any log on the AD side about the try, and how it > looked? > > It didn't seem to even try the AD side, but I can check again. Obviously > just odd that it's working via other apps (ie. those using PAM) but not > Samba itself. > > > While it s probably not hurting, I think that's not a good idea, and > should not be needed in any case. > > Using PAM with winbind didn't work until I made those symlinks (and they > were recommended elsewhere)? > > Thanks, > > James. > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
