One more thing.
> So I'm not saying I'm against open source (who is?) but I feel > that every business has a choice over which licensing model is > most appropriate for their products and profitability. Oracle wanted to get for free patches from RH, but in fact she was stealing customers from RH: http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2011/03/04/red_hat_twarts_oracle_and_novell_with_change_to_source_code_packaging/ And when RH closed the patches thingy for Oracle, she bought a company that was selling a hot-patching technology (BTW this was supposed to be a company committed to Solaris): http://www.internetnews.com/blog/skerner/oracle-buys-ksplice.html In a nutshell, Oracle wants free patches for its Linux, but she does not want to share technology with others. Nice "licensing model"... a.s. ---------------------- Apostolos Syropoulos Xanthi, Greece _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
