> So I'm not saying I'm against open source (who is?) but I feel that > every business has a choice over which licensing model is most appropriate > for > their products and profitability.
And I as a user have the right to like or dislike what a company does. In this case, I strongly believe that what this company does is simply wrong. > before Solaris was ever open sourced. Most of us didn't start using > OpenSolaris because someone tacked "open" in front of its name -- we > chose it for its innovation. It sounds to me as if Oracle has decided to keep The point is that Solaris became, let's say, popular only when it became Open. Only then more people, than the few thousands, got interested in the OS and its innovations. And now that Oracle has close sourced Solaris, I am very sure you will count its users with the fingers of your hands! Finally, when I see something that I feel is wrong I have every right to say what I feel or believe. If you feel I am bashing Oracle, then just delete the message as you had suggested! A.S. ---------------------- Apostolos Syropoulos Xanthi, Greece _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
