On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Carlos Almeida <xtro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/11/10 11:15 PM, Albert Lee wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Carlos Almeida<xtro...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> thanks for your reply, I never had this issue on 134, and is a 100% >>> situation on 147, I also change USB port when I hit this, however, on a >>> long day I run out of usb ports on my laptop :) >>> >>> Regards, >>> CA, >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Ian Johnson<itjohn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I am also experiencing this issue in 147, although it also occasionally >>>> occurred in 134. The only information I can see online for anything like >>>> this is when the keyboard/mouse stop working after switching with a KVM, >>>> but >>>> like yours, my system disables the USB input devices after sitting idle >>>> for >>>> a while, with no KVM involved. For me, unplugging the keyboard/mouse and >>>> plugging them into different USB ports usually fixes the problem, but >>>> this >>>> is clearly not an ideal situation. >>>> On Oct 11, 2010 9:33 AM, "Carlos Almeida"<xtro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Oct 11 12:26:01 lap-calmeida genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /p...@0 >>>>> ,0/pci1028,1...@1d,7/dev...@4 (usb_mid2) removed >>>>> Oct 11 14:13:14 lap-calmeida genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /p...@0 >>>>> ,0/pci1028,1...@1d/mo...@1 (hid1) removed >>>>> >>>>> USB port where mouse is attached, gets disabled after some time without >>>>> desktop use (power management?) , this never happen with snv_134, this >>>>> is >>>> >>>> a >>>>> >>>>> know problem with ON> 134 ? , the worst thing is I fail to get port >>>>> back >>>>> without a reboot, can't even unconfigure/configure the disabled port, >>>>> eg: >>>>> >>>>> r...@lap-calmeida:~# cfgadm -f -c unconfigure usb11/2 >>>>> Unconfigure the device: /devices/p...@0,0/pci1028,1...@1d:2 >>>>> This operation will suspend activity on the USB device >>>>> Continue (yes/no)? yes >>>>> cfgadm: Hardware specific failure: Cannot issue devctl to ap_id: >>>>> /devices/p...@0,0/pci1028,1...@1d:2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> any one had some adtional info on this? >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Carlos Almeida, >> >> Looks like >> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6974470 >> actually. Does the workaround help? >> >> -Albert >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list >> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > Ah, I miss that one when try to find some info about the issue (poor search > skill I guess, sorry about that), and yes the workaround while is not ideal, > indeed works, this was fixed on svn_148, that means we will not have access > to the fix for some time correct ?, meanwhile I can fix it myself I guess, > thanks for the heads up. >
I would be very interested in helping you work on a fix, although I haven't reproduced the problem locally. The time frame of the bug suggests that this changeset introduced it: http://hg.openindiana.org/onnv-gate/rev/b9f8177eb4e2 If you have ideas, let me know; I've filed http://www.illumos.org/issues/336 to track this in Illumos. Thanks, -Albert _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
