-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22/09/10 12:28, Guido Berhoerster wrote: > One is the stock image as produced by distro-constructor which > requires a special tool to construct the partition table and > bootsector for you, i.e. usbcopy on Solaris or the Live USB > Creator for Windows. The other one is a dd'able image which > includes both and has been created manually for convenience. > All of the above will overwrite the contents of your flash media, > though.
I know the difference. My question is... why to publish TWO different versions?. What is the point?. As I said in my first message, the "non bootable" version seems to be useful to install in a already created partition in the USB, instead of overwriting your USB (but then you need an independent boot system already installed). But I would like to know the "official" reason, or if I am missing something. - -- Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ . _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQCVAwUBTJnqSJlgi5GaxT1NAQIX/QP/YC3Ifv0R6c7gHrWK67VGdg4z2kXul8TF 7f7uzGq8YJiMvTMH8AeszodoKjL08o5HZs7dmyUe3c9JYss34HPWZL1rFr2OJjl2 4mfUqc30W+OSx+KgJtVeIx6DhmEk4RE6Ljr49DvvuzVi2OWMyHsi7ykZyZgW8AsS GJ/cAA/FvWk= =Ab9l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
