Thanks!

On Tuesday, July 26, 2016, Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:

> First worked as expected:
>
>
> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-scalability-lithium-redesign-only-beryllium/967/
>
> Second still fails so issue has to be investigated although I do not think
> it is blocker:
>
> cbench: controller benchmarking tool running in mode 'throughput'
> connecting to controller at 10.29.9.112:6633 faking 8 switches offset 1
> :: 10 tests each; 12000 ms per test with 10000 unique source MACs per
> switch learning destination mac addresses before the test starting test
> with 0 ms delay after features_reply ignoring first 1 "warmup" and last 0
> "cooldown" loops connection delay of 0ms per 1 switch(es) debugging info is
> off controller msgbuf_read() = 0: closed connection … exiting
>
> BR/Luis
>
> On Jul 26, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Luis Gomez <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
> The first is a test error, I fixed it and I re-triggered the job.
>
> The second I am not sure, I re-triggered to see if this is an sporadic or
> a real issue.
>
> BR/Luis
>
>
> On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
> Both are classified as non-critical (as per the test case) - but Luis can
> answer better. First one is a create JVM plot fail (so should not be
> critical) but has a message that will need to be reviewed (including
> whether that particular test should be just rerun):
>
>
> ConnectionError: ConnectionError(('Connection aborted.', error(111,
> 'Connection refused'))) caused by: ProtocolError(('Connection aborted.',
> error(111, 'Connection refused')))
>
> The second looks harmless I think - as it is just missing the word RESULT
> but does show the results in flows/sec.
>
> '10:16:57.487 8 switches: flows/sec: 85854 92914 81796 0 82911 84662 0
> 89093 total = 43.102496 per ms ' does not contain 'RESULT'
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:52 AM, An Ho <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team,
>>
>> There are some distribution test failures in Beryllium SR3 related to
>> your project.  Could you or someone from your team please take a moment to
>> mark these issues in the spreadsheet [1] as "OKAY" to release or "BLOCKING"
>> and requires a respin and delay of Beryllium SR3.
>>
>>
>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-scalability-lithium-redesign-only-beryllium/966/
>>
>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-cbench-performance-only-beryllium/1616/
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> An Ho
>>
>> [1]
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwfVqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=1820514274
>> [2]
>> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Beryllium_Release_Plan#Beryllium_SR3_Download
>>
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to