On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 8/1/17 10:20 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:17 AM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 07/31/2017 12:04 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/31/17 10:51 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 7/31/17 12:40 PM, akuster808 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 07/31/2017 10:31 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/31/17 12:16 PM, Armin Kuster wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc | 25 >>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc >>>>>>>> b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc >>>>>>>> index 5e832fa..dc1ba5e 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc >>>>>>>> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc >>>>>>>> @@ -1 +1,26 @@ >>>>>>>> +DEFAULTTUNE ?= "armv8-a" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> do we want the '-a'? The other arm (7) are of the format armv7a (no >>>>>>> '-'). >>>>>> >>>>>> works for me either way. >>>>>> >>>>>> While we are at it. How would we want ‘armv8.1-a’, ‘armv8.2-a’, >>>>>> ‘armv8.3-a' >>>>>> formated as? >>>>> >>>>> My preference is to drop the '-'. As for the '.', I'm not sure.. not >>>>> something >>>>> we've run across before. >>>>> >>>>> We could just drop it (the '.'), but it really depends on if armv81a >>>>> would >>>>> confuse someone (familiar with arm) or not. >>>> >>>> I would suggest to also sync with other distros and ensure that we dont >>>> do something different. Its very costly later. Since applications get >>>> ported to most common combination >>> >>> Sync what part? naming of file? ( sorry lost regarding your comment) >> >> naming convention for arch e.g. >> > > I'd say Debian/Ubuntu -- Fedora/RH would be the two primary sources I'd look > at. > Between debian package names and RPM package names, it should give a clue if > there is any community standard forming for those names. > > (May still be too premature for those environments for the armv8.X-a naming... > and I've not seen it discussed on any other lists either.)
yeah, it will be good to not go through the pain of community doing something else later like *-*-gnueabihf triplet was invented and to date we keep fixing packages for OE to account for gnueabihf can be gnueabi + -mfloat-abi=hard but packages just assume > > --Mark -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
