On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:17 AM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 07/31/2017 12:04 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> >> On 7/31/17 10:51 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> >>> On 7/31/17 12:40 PM, akuster808 wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07/31/2017 10:31 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 7/31/17 12:16 PM, Armin Kuster wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster...@gmail.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc | 25 >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc >>>>>> b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc >>>>>> index 5e832fa..dc1ba5e 100644 >>>>>> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc >>>>>> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv8.inc >>>>>> @@ -1 +1,26 @@ >>>>>> +DEFAULTTUNE ?= "armv8-a" >>>>> >>>>> do we want the '-a'? The other arm (7) are of the format armv7a (no >>>>> '-'). >>>> >>>> works for me either way. >>>> >>>> While we are at it. How would we want ‘armv8.1-a’, ‘armv8.2-a’, >>>> ‘armv8.3-a' >>>> formated as? >>> >>> My preference is to drop the '-'. As for the '.', I'm not sure.. not >>> something >>> we've run across before. >>> >>> We could just drop it (the '.'), but it really depends on if armv81a >>> would >>> confuse someone (familiar with arm) or not. >> >> I would suggest to also sync with other distros and ensure that we dont >> do something different. Its very costly later. Since applications get >> ported to most common combination > > Sync what part? naming of file? ( sorry lost regarding your comment)
naming convention for arch e.g. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core