On 8 May 2017 at 23:15, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> FWIW I think this is a little short-sighted. Why are we ruling out Qt > exactly? > My only strong opinion on what goes into oe-core is that it should be small (both in size and build time) and basic. It's not going to fit everyones needs and is basically there to be a UI until the users replace it with something more suitable. Sato does this without being too huge and there's not currently a strong impetus to replace it. The development of Wayland does make the long-term prospect of Sato interesting: do we port Sato to Wayland too, or keep the Wayland images using the standard Weston demo shell? Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
