On 05/09/2017 01:15 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
LXDE in particular is Gtk2 based, it's no longer being developed, and
has been superseded by LXQt. So it's a non-starter (and so is LXQt,
which should be clear from its name :).
FWIW I think this is a little short-sighted. Why are we ruling out Qt exactly?
We would first have to agree that Qt5 belongs in oe-core with
appropriate level of maintenance and QA, and that it's okay to add half
an hour or more to the building time of a standard GUI image.
From the screenshots of LxQT, it looks like yet another Win95 clone
meant strictly for desktop use that would certainly scale poorly to
small resolution screens. Who would be the target audience for it in the
embedded space? For the purposes of 'engineering UI', Sato is fine, and
we don't need something else.
Alex
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
