On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 19:25 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > I'd tweak the subject line to recipes/*-cross: > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 16:56 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > "yocto-compat-layer.py --machines" showed that shared packages like > > gcc-cross-powerpc64 have a sstate signature that depends on > > TUNEFLAGS. As a result, there are unnecessary rebuilds and potential > > conflicts in a multiconfig. > > > > That's due to the way how TARGET_ARCH is set. Richard Purdie > > suggested > > setting TARGET_ARCH[vardepvalue] as fix, which works. It would be > > shorter to do that in cross.inc instead of repeating the relevant > > line > > in different recipes, but Richard was concerned about potential > > side-effects in other usages of cross.inc. > > s/cross.inc/cross.bbclass/g
Okay, will do both as part of V4. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
