On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 10:16 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 4/11/17 9:56 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > gdb-cross used to be specific to the tune flags, but isn't > > anymore. Therefore it is enough to use TARGET_SYS instead of > > TUNE_PKGARCH to create a unique path. > > Are you sure about this.
It's what Richard told me and he proposed this fix (forgot to mention that), so ultimately this is a question for him. > On non-intel architectures, it used to be VERY common > that the specific instruction set for a process was programmed into gdb. I'm not seeing anything in gdb-cross where that happens. The TUNEFLAGS dependency was just for the datadir, not for anything else that might configure the instruction set. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
