On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 20:27 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > fwiw, I've been maintaining acpica recipe in meta-oe, and will > keep an > > > eye here as well. > > > meta-luv supports both x86* and arm*, and we have an interest in > > > having the same features available and working for qemuaarch64. > > > > I was not aware of this. Perhaps there is no need for us to maintain > a > > separate recipe in meta-luv. > > Looks like there is consensus that maintaining an acpica recipe in > OE-core is the right approach. I'll prepare a revision of this patch > series that includes acpica instead of iasl and also addresses the > other > points that Ricardo raised.
Just to be clear. I meant that it would be better for meta-luv to leverage the acpica recipe present in meta-OE :). -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
